Texas Sex Ed is Opt Out
On August 1, 2024, Sex Education went from Opt In to Opt Out. this changes makes the process less transparent and easier for the State to control what your children’s culture might include. Please, communicate with your children’s school districts to find out what their policies are and how to opt out of Sex Ed if their policies do not support your cultural values. Here is my letter to my school district.
See: https://texasscorecard.com/video/8-1-24-a-major-change-to-sex-ed-in-texas/
Trust the Science
"Trust the science" is not an invitation to read 2 studies and pretend like they encompass the entirety of a field's body of work. At the very least (seriously, any less is silliness): find 200 studies, get AI to write 1-paragraph summaries for each of them, and then read those summaries. 200 paragraphs from AI is only like 40-50 pages. If you cannot be bothered to read that much you are not "trusting the science". Anything less than this is faith, not trust.
Too many have faith in our institutions, in the media, in the random stuff their grandmother says, in all sorts of things. Very few people have taken the time to gather enough evidence to establish trust. The internet grifters love this quality of American society. Kamala Crash and Project 2025 are excellent examples of this.
Kamala Crash was 1) not a stock market crash (merely a dip), and 2) has nothing to do with Kamala. If we look at the markets and the concomitant pressures over the past 6 months, the market was clearly running hot; any bubble will eventually burst. The market is already beginning to swing back up and it will likely normalize in the next week or two before going into another period of swelling and then falling. Anyone who was strategically diversified across capital assets barely felt this latest dip. No big deal.
Project 2025 is a set of documents written by private citizens. No one in public office is pushing this document into legislation. The goals written within it are the goals of those private citizens who have written it; they are a sort of wish list from a bunch of wealthy people who are whining about the Constitution, Laws, and Judiciary of these United States. Project 2025 is not Trump’s. trump has Agenda 47; it is completely different from and in many cases contradictory to Project 2025. All of this uproar has done no more but thrust the Heritage Foundation into the spotlight and aggrandize them.
These are examples of people having faith in institutions and media. Institutions and media propped up Project 2025 and Kamala Crash without evidence to support the theories. They are simply click bait. Trust requires knowledge. Faith in institutions requires an empty skull. Your choice.
Imported Negroes
Kamala Harris is black now! My stance is that this does not matter; this cannot matter to the black community.
No matter what her father is, he was not born here in the US. Kamala’s family does not have 5, 7, or 10 black generations of blood, sweat, and tears poured into this great nation. She is not a Foundational Black American (FBA). Why does this matter?
For 100 years, the deep state (Democrats and the Uniparty especially) has been trying to replace FBAs by using immigrants. When the Irish came, they elevated the Irish above the black, but not to the level of whiteness; that took time. Same with the Italians. Italians were not considered white until fairly recently; before being considered white, they were only as good as “not black”. Each time a new population enters the US, the Uniparty and Democrats elevate that group while subjugating FBA.
Barack Obama was not FBA either and he was elevated to the Presidency. If one wants to know the fullness of great replacement theory, look no further than the black leadership of the Democrat Party; they have never had FBA at the forefront. As we look upon the political landscape, we see FBA near or at the top of every political corner except the Democrat Party. Dr. Ben Carson, Byron Donalds, and Wesley Hunt are all pulling big numbers, big crowds, and providing guidance to the Republican Party. Libertarians have Maj Toure and Hotep Jesus. The Green Party have Cynthia McKinney and others. Cornell West is making his play with the Independents. No FBAs have any chance or opportunity inside the Democrat Party to rise to Vice President or President. None.
The Establishment is making a concerted, calculated effort to oppress blacks who were born here. Why? It is no secret that FBAs have taken the 1st Amendment by the reigns. Whites everywhere are expressing, “A white person could never say something like that!!!” to FBAs who are keeping it 100. This is more than mere perception; this is a reality. There are a number of posts on my social media (all public, just take a look) where a white person was suspended or otherwise restricted due to a post and I would copy the post and nothing would happen to me. The woke agenda does not allow for the punishment of blacks. If they cannot punish us, what can they do?
Since it is not in their measure to punish blacks, the woke extremists must find a different way to get blacks to comply. What they are doing is pushing abortion and importing like-minded, weak, anti-American blacks. 25% of blacks are murdered (1) before exiting the womb while they allow troves of unAmerican blacks to scurry across the border and repopulate minority communities; the black percentage won’t decrease, just the FBA percentage. Slowly, FBAs are waking up. There has been a sharp rise in interest for Immigration studies by FBAs. We can only hope that the pace quickens, and we can get to a 30% non-Democrat vote among blacks by November. For, surely, if Kamala is elected as President, we will have many struggles ahead.
(1) I used to be one of those “it is just a clump of cells” people. Then I lived through a miscarriage: no one ever said “Oh well, just a clump of cells, who cares!!!” Everyone said, “I am so sorry you lost the baby”.
Presidential Immunity
Last month SCOTUS entered a ruling on Presidential Immunity. The ruling only states that Presidential Immunity is real. It does not reach anything else. A direct quote:
"We conclude that under our constitutional structure of separated powers, the nature of Presidential power requires that a former President have some immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts during his tenure in office. At least with respect to the President’s exercise of his core constitutional powers, this immunity must be absolute. As for his remaining official actions, he is also entitled to immunity. At the current stage of proceedings in this case, however, we need not and do not decide whether that immunity must be absolute, or instead whether a presumptive immunity is sufficient."
They (rightly, as it is Congress' job) do not tell us:
What the core constitutional powers are
outside of core constitutional powers, what powers get 1) no immunity, 2) qualified immunity, and 3) absolute immunity
whether the case brought deals with actions that are immune or not
a litany of other things too long to describe here
SCOTUS framed things quite well in another direct quote:
"We granted certiorari to consider the following question: 'Whether and if so to what extent does a former President enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office[?]'"
SCOTUS wholly refuse to answer anything further. Another, extremely important, note is SCOTUS does not have the power to rule upon or throw out the case because Original Jurisdiction lies with the District Court. They have Appellate Jurisdiction to hear questions of error regarding the Lower Court's actions (or inaction). In this case, again, a direct quote would say much:
"The District Court declined to decide whether the indicted conduct involved official acts."
and
"Like the District Court, the D. C. Circuit declined to analyze the actions described in the indictment to determine whether they involved official acts."
Then they remanded it back to the Lower Court for further analysis. All this ruling implies is that Courts must force the prosecution to define the indicted conduct specifically before ruling against a Defendant. This is a restatement of Due Process which is the only clause to be mentioned twice in our Constitution (5th and 14th Amendments) as Due Process is THAT IMPORTANT to We, the People's, protections against a tyrannical Government.
I think part of the reasoning here is that if they rule that Presidents can be indicted after leaving office for any reason at any time, it would open up a can of worms that would destroy the Office of the Presidency in its entirety. Who would take that job knowing they could be thrown in jail directly thereafter because a political opponent now holds the DoJ in their hands? The job is already underpaid, we cannot put further burdens upon it. In other words, the President is a normal citizen after leaving office, and without immunity, it opens that normal citizen up (by and through their perceived or actual fame) to further litigation which (in turn) renders the Equal Protection clause ineffective in their specific case.
This happened to me a while ago on a completely different, and much, much, much smaller level. The Government said basically "Mr. Henry is in trouble for conduct." When I pressed them on what specific conduct, they fell short. I fought and won the case by myself when every attorney around me told me I was screwed because the system was coming for me. Due Process and these kinds of rulings are extremely important to me because of how personal it is. For 5 years, my life literally depended upon my understanding of this kind of law.
Kinds of Conservativism
A lot of people say they are “conservative”. Always remember to ask which kind of conservative. Not all forms of conservativism are compatible with American public life. These past few months have really made this clear to a purely American Constitutional Conservative like this writer.
Religious Conservativism is a far different way of life than American Constitutional Conservativism. The greatest rift here, by my measure, is abortion politics. An American Constitutional Conservative would be wholly satisfied with a call to “leave it to the States”; a true American Constitutional Conservative holds the Constitution - including the 9th and 10th amendments thereto - in extremely high esteem. A Religious Conservative could make banning abortion his life’s work.
President Jefferson had this to say about it: “Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man & his god… the legitimate powers of government reach actions only and not opinions… I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties.”
We can see that the effect of American Conservativism is to uphold a man’s right to worship whatever he may worship and that this worship should affect none of that man’s social duties. In other words, one can have whatever religious tendencies one wishes without intending to write those tendencies as law. I can complete any and all civic or social tasks without the enactment of religion.
Once we get past the founding, despotism lies but a short journey ahead. Continuing with the currently ripe abortion issue we can see this both ways. On one hand, we mandate “abortion is medicine”; this disenfranchises the set of surgeons who prescribe to religion. On the other hand, we mandate “abortion is murder”; this disenfranchises the set of persons who believe in a childless existence. Either way, someone lives a despotic life crushed under the weight of faction.
In a purely American Constitutional Conservative vision, we would have abortion pushed down to the lowest level away from Federal hands. A people who would choose abortion could choose to live somewhere whose doctors believe it to be medicine. A people who would choose life could choose to live somewhere whose doctors believe abortion to be murder. This idealism - in either case - would be left to the people and their representatives, not to the Feds.
We do, in this nation have professional licensing of doctors at the State and local levels, should it not be the case that the abortion question also be answered by these same licensing professionals?
Trump got Shot
It has been a crazy time. One can see all the theories (the Left won’t call their own “conspiracy theorists”!!!) on the internet. Those theories don’t matter, one will withstand the test of time, the others will fall.
This event has galvanized MAGA. Before J13, the Left was spewing vitriolic rhetoric over and over again; the Left was burning down cities; the Left was wild af. This shooting - the death of a firefighter, the grazing of Trump, the wounding of others - has sent MAGA into a wild motion that I am unsure it can come directly out from. Time will tell.
Be easy, keep voting, keep speaking (even louder now). Keep it MAGA.